Meet the Invoice
What has it cost to uphold the NASA narrative? And what could we have done instead?
Since its official birth in 1958, NASA has consumed over $700 billion in public funds — with no signs of slowing. And yet, for that vast expenditure, what have we actually received?
Total Cost (1958–2024):
$700+ billion USD
(Adjusted for inflation, and climbing daily)
Current Budget (2024):
~$25.4 billion per year
→ That’s $70 million per day
Sample Projects & Costs:
- Apollo Program: ~$250 billion (inflation-adjusted)
- ISS: ~$150 billion and counting
- Artemis Moon Return: Projected $93 billion (2020–2025) — still no boots on dust
Helium: NASA’s Hidden Line Item
What NASA Uses
- NASA consumes approximately 75–100 million standard cubic feet (MMcf) of helium per year, mostly at Kennedy Space Center and Stennis Space Center for rocket propulsion, tank pressurization, coolant systems, and purging operations National Academies Press.
- This constitutes roughly the largest single institutional share of global helium usage magnetica.comNational Academies Press.
Estimated Annual Cost
- In 2022–2023, NASA secured contracts for both gaseous and liquid helium supply, pricing between $900–$1,200 per MMcf depending on the contract type and purity nasa.gov+2helixexploration.com+2theoregongroup.com+2.
- At 90 MMcf/year and ~$1,000/MMcf, this implies NASA spends around $90 million annually on helium alone.
Cost in Context
- That’s roughly 4% of NASA's 2024 annual budget (~$25.4 billion), but dedicated solely to handling a single non-renewable resource.
- Since global helium production is limited (~6 Bcf/year) and shrinking, NASA’s demand contributes heavily to market scarcity and price inflation
What Have We Got for It?
- Grainy footage from the 1960s
- A handful of photographs we can’t verify
- A permanently “occupied” space station that never films stars
- A string of “probes” sent to unreachable places
- An Earth that still looks suspiciously CGI
- Recycled dreams, decades late and billions deep
What Could We Have Done Instead?
With $700+ billion, humanity could have:
- Provided clean drinking water to every human on Earth — 20 times over
- Eradicated global hunger for at least 30 years
- Built resilient, decentralised energy grids in every poor country
- Funded free, non-corporate healthcare for millions — even in the U.S.
- Transitioned entire cities to regenerative agriculture and food forests
- Created open-source education and distributed knowledge tools globally
Instead…
We got green screens, foam rockets, and spinning wire harnesses on YouTube.
Closing Note:
“NASA taught us to aim for the stars. But maybe it’s time we aimed lower — somewhere near the truth.”